Stop CPS and Court Corruption
In 1988 George Miller, the original architect of P.L. 96-272, and Chairman of the congressionally appointed Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families, recognized the fraud being committed in the name of child “protection”, and stated:
“What has been demonstrated here is that you have a system that is simply in contempt. This system has been sued and sued and orders have been issued and they just continue on their merry way. And HHS just continues to look the other way. You have a system that is not only out of control, it’s illegal at this point. What you are really engaged in is state sponsored child abuse.”
Stop State Sanctioned Child Abuse
“There is something bad happening to our children in family courts today that is causing them more harm than drugs, more harm than crime and even more harm than child molestation.” Judge Watson L. White Superior Court Judge, Cobb County, Georgia
The Arizona DCS aka “Devils Chosen Servants” will not allow the Shoars children to talk to their parents on the phone and the “Catholic Lesbian Custodian” Kim M. Planchard has filed a “Restraining Order” against the parents! She abused the children before and one child while being kidnapped screamed “SHE WILL KILL US”…
One of the SS/DCS workers who had to be DEMON POSSESSED after the order of Janet Napolitano LAUGHED at the children SCREAMING!
Hey DUCEY…you are one hell of a Governor…complicit in this abuse by your feral employees and with YOUR Judiciary ruling in favor of every law broken by!
FYI Ducey…expect to get a phone call from one of the most AWARD WINNING Wall Street Journal reporters who has ALL the information…read my lips…say fabricated charges (dismissed) made up new LIES and the trail of EVERY broken law by your DCS and Judiciary which translated…will be the EVIDENCE in a law suit that will cause your carrer and Arizona’s bank account to be bled dry.
You have ONE WEEK to get have the Shoar children released to their parents Ducey or the the citizen TAX PAYERS will make sure you are HISTORY when the fullness of the truth is published outside your circle of controlled media!
HEAR THE SHOARS KIDNAPPED AND BRUTALLIZED CHILDREN SCREAM THANKS TO JUDGES SUSANNA PINEDA, COLLEEN MCNALLY AND ARIZONAS ROGUE JUDICIARY AND CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES UNDER GOVERNOR DOUG DUCEY!
NOW HEAR THEIR MOTHER!
Family Links and Shoars Family Links Exposing The Unconstitutional Kidnapping and Subsecquent Documented Abuse Of The Shoars Children and Family
Why Arizona Judges and DCS/CPS Reinstated Charges Dismissed By Jewish Judge Cohen Then Brutally Kidnap The Shoars Children
Freedom and Justice For The Shoars Family
Jeff Shoars
MEDICAL KIDNAP COVERAGE
Arizona Governor Doug Ducey
Judge Susanna PINEDA!
(602-372-2958)
Judge Sally Schneider DUNCAN who set free MURDERER OF A CHILD!
FOREWORD: Time to connect the dots to the Rouge “NaziZona” AKA Arizona State Judiciary as seen in their treatment of the Shoars children and family and to the protection of child abusing pedophiles in the Judiciary by “appointment”!
My insight is…when a Judge is appointed by a documented protector of an ADMITTED “pornographer, pedophile, and raping sodomizing abuser of children”, then that Judge is likewise a “pornographer, pedophile, and raping sodomizing abuser of children protector” by “association with because that appointment in the act itself of Arizona Judges Susanna Pineda and Sally Duncan by then Governor Janet “Pedophile Protector” Napolitano had to be the direct result of the “meeting of minds and bodies” in the course of numerous face to face in closed chambers meetings where they were interviewed by this HomoHero of the embedded in the United States of America city of Sodom and Gomorrah which is why Janet chose them and for NO other reason. (The Nazi Party was run by SODOMITES and PEDERASTS/PEDOPHILES!)
Sexual abusers of children in “NaziZona” control is historically documented in THIS article…where you will read about those children removed from their homes and placed in Arizona “chosen” homes where pedophiles are doing what they do best but…if they were “GAY”…never had a worry when Napolitano was Governor and more so now because the Arizona DCS is run by “NapoitanoItes” including the present Governor and most of the Judiciary. Scary huh?
Read THIS to see that NOW in Arizona…there is a movement among “SHRINKS” to say feelings of “pedophilia is NORMAL” which might explain why “NaziZona” DCS “FemiNazi’s” hate families like the Shoars…and pick “Single” so called “mothers” like Kim M. Planchard to have ABUSIVE custody of the Shoars children…and…AND…this woman is a member of…the NOT Holy Roman (pedophile infested) Catholic Church!
So it should not be a surprise if a family is a FAMILY such as the Shoars family who’s view of life is after the the Creator’s order of Adam and Eve (only the demon possessed who suffer from “sexual dyslexia read Adam and Steve equate a anus with a vagina) with a man and woman being married with children and who are “heterosexual” to be targeted by the “Femi-Nazis” in “NaziZona”/Arizona like DCS “SS” worker Bonnie Platter who dresses and acts like she is playing in a movie!
After all…we have to remember who appointed the ONE Judge who followed Platters “orders” to activate a lie filled “reinstatement” of original charges dismissed by JEW Judge Cohen who by the way…was conveniently out of town so this could be done (with Judge McNally’s approval…Good Job McNally!) and that was for Platter to run right into the waiting arms of that Judge “Appointed by pedophile protector and former Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano” …the one and only Judge Susanna Pineda who gave the DCS the green light for the illegal DOUBLE JEOPARDY KIDNAPPING of the Shoars children living peacefully and happily in Nevada!
There were signs of sexual abuse of at least one Shoars child after being returned to the family after their first kidnapping …being away from them for over 600 days and this was observed by members of the Shoars family besides the father and mother. Of course they are not going to report this to “NaziZonaFemiNazi DCS workers” given their past experiences…are YOU crazy!
So in the VERY best interest of that child knowing that the abuse of that child was in FACT the direct result of the illegal removal of the Shoars children in the first place, Jeff and Tabitha Shoars would never again trust NaziZona in anything concerning their children because they knew from reporting to them in the past of/by “foster care Kim M. Planchard abuser of their children” that it would never investigate her let alone hold themselves responsible nor would they seek and find those guilty of the sexual abuse of their son.
So after the original DCS charges were dismissed by Judge Bruce Cohen, the Shoars moved to Nevada not only to make a fresh start but also because the Arizona pedophile protecting Judiciary and DCS would of course fabricate and lie if they knew that family knew about this child. The fact they jumped the gun and came to Nevada to steal their children IS PROOF they knew about the sexual abuse of the one child if not more because of their history of their placing children in documented pedophile infested Arizona group homes which is why they reactivated charges to escape their culpability in the abuse of the Shoars child and therefore HAD TO in order to hide the truth and protect themselves…falsely accuse Jeff Shoars of sexual abuse of his children in the reinstating the “dismissed charges” by Cohen!
MORE coming later…am “tired” at the moment but for now…
As a combat Veteran I will honor my commitment to the Constitution to no end by exposing each and every one of you in your individual and collective violation of both the law of the land and God’s laws as the “domestic enemies” that I identify you as being until you release the Shoars children to their parents! Just know this that I also consider you being the very “sons and daughters of Satan” which God identifies you also as being which assures you of your place in the Lake of Fire and Brimstone!
READ THIS ARTICLE ABOUT NAPOLITANO AND HER HOMOLAND SECURITY and BELOW WHICH DOCUMENTS HER SEXUAL PROTECTION OF PEDOPHILE PREFERENCE!
U.S. Attorney in hot seat as politics and law clash – Janet Napolitano
Insight on the News, Sept 2, 1996 by Jamie Dettmer See Source
Serious questions have surfaced regarding a bus driver, a Clinton appointee and a search warrant.
Apartment manager Jenni Burk is fuming. Five months have not cooled her anger. “I thought about marching down there to her office and giving her a piece of my mind! ” the angry mother of three says. “I was amazed. I couldn’t believe that with all the evidence they had they couldn’t get a search warrant. I can’t understand why that woman with all her power wouldn’t stop children from being hurt.”
“That woman” is U.S. Attorney Janet Napolitano.
And the 56-year-old Burk isn’t alone in wondering what led the controversial Clinton appointee to refuse investigators with the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, or USPIS, a warrant to search the one-bedroom Phoenix home of one of Burk’s residents, James Moore, an admitted child pornographer and molester. Republicans, including presidential candidate Bob Dole, also are demanding to know why Napolitano declined to act against Moore, and the Senate Judiciary Committee is investigating claims aired in May on the ABC program 20/20 that she refused the warrant because it was part of a sting operation targeting homosexuals.
As far as Burk and USPIS Inspector Karen Cassatt are concerned, there were clear grounds for searching Moore’s apartment: He was receiving suspicious-looking videos from known child-porn and adult videomakers such as Spartacus, an overseas distributor, and the Hollywood-based IVC. The specter of frightened-looking Mexican boys, some possibly as young as 9, who frequently were spotted with Moore also was troubling. On several occasions Burk asked the openly homosexual Moore who the children were and where they were from. “He always said they were the children of friends,” she tells Insight. “I knew he was gay I had no problem with that — there are a lot of gay men living here. But I was worried about the children. There was one boy — he must have been about 13 or 14 — and I could see he was scared to death.” Burk also noted that Moore’s apartment was full of photographs of young boys, most of them nude from the waist up.
The Phoenix Police Department agreed there was “probable cause” for further inquiry and, after Napolitano refused in January 1996 to have anything to do with the case, a state judge was approached and promptly granted a search warrant. A motherlode of child-porn evidence was discovered and Moore, a bus driver, admitted to having had sex on numerous occasions with boys. He was charged with sexually exploiting minors by a local county prosecutor, a charge that under Arizona state law carries a sentence of 10 to 24 years on each count. He is awaiting trial on a vast variety of charges, some of which he is contesting.
In a press conference the day after 20/20 broadcast an interview with an outraged Cassatt, Napolitano flatly denied that she had blocked the Moore search warrant on the grounds that it was part of a nationwide federal undercover operation targeting gays. She labeled the Cassatt allegation “fundamentally offensive,” declaring: “It’s just not true. It’s just flat wrong.” According to Napolitano, there were clear legal grounds to decline the warrant.
Attorney General Janet Reno and the White House have defended Napolitano. They maintain she has become an election-year political target and that Republicans are using her in a bid to knock President Clinton’s crime-fighting credentials in the run-up to November. Napolitano supporters also argue that conservatives have been keen to get the US. attorney ever since she served as one of Anita Hill’s lawyers during the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings in 1991. Indeed, Senate confirmation of Napolitano’s appointment as Arizona’s U.S. attorney was extensively delayed in 1993 when Republicans raised questions about her role in the Thomas hearings.
But previously undisclosed evidence obtained by Insight, including an audiotape of a tense hour-long conversation between Cassatt and Napolitano assistants Mary Murgea and Sharon Novitsky, raises new questions about Napolitano’s decision to refuse the Moore search warrant. It provides support for Cassatt’s contention that the U.S. attorney was unhappy with undercover operations that include as targets homosexuals suspected of illegal acts.
Other documents obtained by Insight detail USPIS discussions about the Moore case and, with the audiotape, add to the impression that ongoing child molestation or not, Napolitano would not countenance a sting operation against homosexuals.
The Moore case was a small part of a much larger, two-year USPIS probe called “Operation Special Delivery.” The operation has been highly successful: 45 people nationwide have been charged with a variety of child-porn offences. In an effort to catch potential child molesters, USPIS inspectors set up a scam child-porn business and contacted men whose names had appeared on a customer mailing list of a porn outlet.
Moore was one of the men, and the inspectors sent him a solicitation offering him videos of “hot lads.” Moore then ordered two tapes: Young Teen and Young Men. At the same time, apartment-manager Burk’s suspicions about her tenant were aroused. She was concerned about the stream of young Mexican boys visiting Moore’s apartment, she says. Burk also was worried about the videos Moore received and coincidentally contacted the USPIS just as it was about to swoop on the unsuspecting bus driver.
But when Cassatt asked for a search warrant, it took Napolitano’s office nearly two months to decide whether to grant the request. Eventually, it turned Cassatt down on the official grounds that Moore wasn’t “predisposed” to buy child porn and that the evidence against the 55-year-old homosexual didn’t meet probable-cause standards. In their argument about legal flaws, Napolitano’s assistants cited one case in the 9th Circuit Court, which encompasses Arizona, in which a judge threw out a search warrant on entrapment grounds.
Insight has learned that the Justice Department’s antipornography unit, the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, or CEOS, disagreed with the position taken by Napolitano. It volunteered to send a prosecutor to Arizona to take on the case, only to be met with a strong “no thanks” from Napolitano.
Justice Department sources say the CEOS believed Napolitano and her assistants were wrong to argue that judges in the 9th Circuit wouldn’t be happy with the warrant. The sources, who asked not to be identified, say several Operation Special Delivery warrants similar to Moore’s were served without any problems.
At the request of the USPIS. at the time of the interdepartmental arguments, Justice Department trial attorney Georgiann Cerese even wrote an opinion analyzing the constitutionality of sting operations such as Special Delivery. She concluded: “A number of courts have discussed and reviewed the permissibility of utilizing such undercover operations in the investigation of child-pornography offences. The courts have uniformly held that undercover operations are justifiable and permissible.” She added: “Undercover operations have been found to be justifiable due to the nature of the commission of crimes involving child pornography and the evils caused by child pornography.”
How could Napolitano’s reading of probable-cause law be so different from that of the Justice Department and the CEOS? A Jan. 29 telephone conversation between Napolitano assistants and Cassatt may shed some light on the issue. The secretly taped telephone conversation, which occurred after the U.S. attorney’s office had decided to block the search, tends to support Cassatt’s allegation that a political reason was behind Napolitano’s decision to refuse the warrant.
Most of the conversation involves heated discussions between Napolitano assistants Murgea and Novitsky lambasting Cassatt for going to a local prosecutor for a warrant. There also are disputes about the evidence against Moore, with the USPIS inspector insisting that there were ample grounds for action.
Murgea at one point states that Napolitano had “concerns with respect to the lack of predisposition and the potential entrapment.” Cassatt points out that she had had no trouble on previous cases: “I have had these [warrants] approved in Reno and Las Vegas…. We’ve had them approved in different districts all across the country…. I think I am on very strong constitutional grounds because this came from the Department of Justice in Washington.”
Later during the call Murgea states: “Aside from that [the probable-cause dispute], there’s a policy consideration. And for you, it may be the end justifies the means. For us, I think that there is a policy consideration to be given … and that is targeting these individuals and what is used to target them.” Murgea spells out after several more exchanges what she means by individuals: “I’m concerned, you know, on some of these cases … that this is targeting homosexual males and that’s all you have on them.”
Rebecca Even, public-affairs officer for the Arizona U.S. attorney’s office, argues that the Murgea comment should not be taken out of context. “What people don’t understand is that Napolitano only made the final decision [not to proceed]. People don’t appreciate the process behind a legal decision. Other attorneys here looked at this. In all, five legal minds considered it. We had probable-cause problems.”
She claims that under Napolitano, the Arizona U.S. attorney’s office has a record second to none in prosecuting child-molestation cases. From July 1993 to July 1995, the office has prosecuted 249 cases involving child molestation and sexual contact with minors. Many of those cases concerned sexual abuse of boys by men.