Australians Vaccinated for COVID-19 test Positive for HIV (Vaccination is like a Box of Poisons)

So the Australian government terminated an agreement with a company to supply millions of doses of a COVID-19 vaccine. Mike Adams writes:

As reported via Great Game India:

Australia Scraps Billion Dollar Coronavirus Vaccine After Participants Test HIV Positive

“The Australian Government has scrapped a billion dollar coronavirus vaccine agreement with Australian biotech company CSL Limited to supply 51 million doses of a Covid-19 vaccine being developed by the University of Queensland after several trial participants returned false positive HIV test results.” (end quote)

What’s interesting is that this story is claiming the HIV tests are “false positives.” But if HIV is actually detected, then how is it false?

Notice that when someone is found to be carrying the coronavirus, it’s never called a false positive. It’s simply called a “positive” result or a new “case” of infection. By that logic, these vaccine recipients should also be labeled “cases” of HIV.

And it begs the question: What’s being put into the vaccine that resembles HIV closely enough to trigger a positive test result?

Mike Adams, DEPOPULATION VAX: Trial subjects injected with coronavirus vaccines suddenly test positive for HIV – updated, VaccineDeaths (December 11, 2020). Retrieved December 16, 2020, from

Adams raises some good points. How were these “false positives” determined to be false? Can we trust vaccinators, who continually murder, to tell the truth? And what kind of poison might be in the vaccine that would make trial participants test positive for HIV?

The lies and inconsistencies have no end for the vaccinators. On the one hand, regarding testing for COVID-19, endless false positives are accepted blindly as true positives. But on the other, HIV positives for those vaccinated for COVID-19 are considered false.

If there is evidence that those vaccinated don’t really have HIV, then where is it? And, if there is “evidence,” how can we take it seriously? Even if vaccination wasn’t immoral (but it is), vaccination is a matter of trust (as Shawn Siegel notes) — and the vaccinators lost that long ago.

Vaccination as a box of poisons

HIV or not, vaccination is a box of poisons — you never know what you’re going to get, whether officially or clandestinely: neurotoxins, infertility/abortion inducers, carcinogens, animal, insect and aborted baby DNA, etc. No wonder we have an epidemic of autism, cancer, and SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome).

Just a few examples from history:

  • In early vaccine history, when arm-to-arm vaccination was performed (at least on the “lower classes”), vaccination spread syphilis and leprosy.
  • Millions may have been injected with SV40, a cancer-causing chemical, via the polio vaccine
  • The “vaccine giant”/scientist Maurice Hilleman blames the polio vaccine for importing AIDS into the country: “So we brought African Greens in and I didn’t know we were importing the AIDS virus at the time.”
  • The covert use of vaccines around the world to cause miscarriages

Repent, vaccinators!

With this in mind, check out below this portion of a letter to the English publication The National Anti-Compulsory Vaccination Reporter in 1878. The author calls the vaccinators to repentance, whom he says are on a “satanic mission of scattering disease and death.”

I presume that your valuable paper is read by parties on the other side—let me briefly address these words for their edification: “Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape, &c.?” If there be such a principle as justice, your condemnation, though it linger long, is sure as the return of day. We know men who were public vaccinators who have been wise enough to give it up for conscience’ sake. Let me commend their example to your notice.

“V–RS (Vipers) and V–RS (Vaccination). To the Editor of the N.A.V.C. Reporter,” The National Anti-Compulsory Vaccination Reporter, vol. III, no. 2 (November 1, 1878).

Leave a Reply